I found this good site that is where people freely express their art and their style.
The things there are pretty good and it's good to look at different styles and buy some art if you are interested.
The site is www.artbreak.com.
Sunday, December 11, 2011
Sunday, October 16, 2011
Oxford Program
This summer I was lucky enough to be in Oxbridge Academics Program. I was in Oxford Tradition and I had a lot of fun.
England compared to Canada is a lot different. Canada used to be an English colony and everything but it is still England that has a lot more culture and wonderful arts to see.
I was in Oxford for a month and saw the Elgin Marbles which made me very happy.
Too bad you can't touch it. But with something this old it's normal to be afraid that if you touch it it might be a breaking spot and cause the whole thing to collapse.
The work is very intricate, I like the strong pop-ups on the wall decorations, the muscle tones are done especially well. I can't even draw muscles and sculpting it would be even more difficult.
Too bad so many of them are destroyed though. I would definitely want to see the entire thing of those sculptures.Sometimes only the head of a horse doesn't tell how well the sculptor is about the entire body of the horse, but I could tell by the head that he/she had a pretty good idea of it.
My only regret of England was but I did not get to see the Stone Henge. I would love to blast music to see how good the system is as echoing and hypnotizing people.
Paris was even magnificent in buildings like the Bastille and the Louvre. The Louvre was massive and the transparent pyramids were brilliant. Too bad the reversed pyramid on the bottom is inside the shopping place, people would have paid a lot more attention to it if that is the case.
Paris was beautiful. I cant possibly describe it. You'd have to be me to experience it. Nights in Paris are the most fabulous sceneries ever :D
England compared to Canada is a lot different. Canada used to be an English colony and everything but it is still England that has a lot more culture and wonderful arts to see.
I was in Oxford for a month and saw the Elgin Marbles which made me very happy.
Too bad you can't touch it. But with something this old it's normal to be afraid that if you touch it it might be a breaking spot and cause the whole thing to collapse.
The work is very intricate, I like the strong pop-ups on the wall decorations, the muscle tones are done especially well. I can't even draw muscles and sculpting it would be even more difficult.
Too bad so many of them are destroyed though. I would definitely want to see the entire thing of those sculptures.Sometimes only the head of a horse doesn't tell how well the sculptor is about the entire body of the horse, but I could tell by the head that he/she had a pretty good idea of it.
My only regret of England was but I did not get to see the Stone Henge. I would love to blast music to see how good the system is as echoing and hypnotizing people.
Paris was even magnificent in buildings like the Bastille and the Louvre. The Louvre was massive and the transparent pyramids were brilliant. Too bad the reversed pyramid on the bottom is inside the shopping place, people would have paid a lot more attention to it if that is the case.
Paris was beautiful. I cant possibly describe it. You'd have to be me to experience it. Nights in Paris are the most fabulous sceneries ever :D
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Composition
Hello I'm back everyone!!! :D
So recently I was super busy with all the responsibilities I have to fulfill....being in school is never easy....
So I have been reading some books lately, some of them boring but some very interesting.....just like any other books in the world.
So today I'm going to talk about composition.
I like analyzing composition, it's usually what the artists base their paintings on. It's a part of the painting where they can freely experience their ideas where it's only lines and circles. And what makes me amazed is that so many details can be created under the power of these simple lines and shapes. And how those "seemly random" compositions can be so well thought out in its term of diagonals, horizontal and vertical lines forming the perfect balance or imbalance.
I can't unfortunately find any REAL compositions.....T^T
So recently I was super busy with all the responsibilities I have to fulfill....being in school is never easy....
So I have been reading some books lately, some of them boring but some very interesting.....just like any other books in the world.
So today I'm going to talk about composition.
I like analyzing composition, it's usually what the artists base their paintings on. It's a part of the painting where they can freely experience their ideas where it's only lines and circles. And what makes me amazed is that so many details can be created under the power of these simple lines and shapes. And how those "seemly random" compositions can be so well thought out in its term of diagonals, horizontal and vertical lines forming the perfect balance or imbalance.
I can't unfortunately find any REAL compositions.....T^T
Sunday, April 10, 2011
EEUUUURRROOOOPPPPEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hi I'm back from the most AWESOME trip over Spring Break!
Spain, Austria, Hungary..................I was literally in heaven over there.
I mean the architecture in Austria was so Baroque styled that I was happy enough to die. I was living in an apartment with SCUPTED PEOPLE SUPPORTING IT!!!!
Wow it was just amazing.
Okay so I went to the El Museo Del Prado in Madrid. And I was fangirling all over the famous paintings of the famous artists I knew and learned about. Then I ditched my friends because they were too slow =,= and also they don't want to stay in front of one painting for too long.....THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE VALUE OF THE ART!!!
So I saw these paintings which I knew:
"Las Meninas" by Velaquez
Which was awesome by the way. I went through great troubles trying to find it and whack the people out of my way with my elbow....
It was a BIG painting! And the texture of the surface was amazing.
"Saturn Devouring His Son" By Goya.
It was in a little corner with his Black Painting series. I was surprised at how small it was actually. And it also stood out from all the historical Black Paintings surrounding it.
And finally my favourite one: "The Garden of Earthly Delights" by Bosch!!!
This was the triplych in front of which I stood for 15 minutes inspecting every single details of the possible symbolism of. I was so happy that I was able to see the real painting. All the things were just impressive on there.
Spain, Austria, Hungary..................I was literally in heaven over there.
I mean the architecture in Austria was so Baroque styled that I was happy enough to die. I was living in an apartment with SCUPTED PEOPLE SUPPORTING IT!!!!
Wow it was just amazing.
Okay so I went to the El Museo Del Prado in Madrid. And I was fangirling all over the famous paintings of the famous artists I knew and learned about. Then I ditched my friends because they were too slow =,= and also they don't want to stay in front of one painting for too long.....THEY DO NOT UNDERSTAND THE VALUE OF THE ART!!!
So I saw these paintings which I knew:
"Las Meninas" by Velaquez
Which was awesome by the way. I went through great troubles trying to find it and whack the people out of my way with my elbow....
It was a BIG painting! And the texture of the surface was amazing.
"Saturn Devouring His Son" By Goya.
It was in a little corner with his Black Painting series. I was surprised at how small it was actually. And it also stood out from all the historical Black Paintings surrounding it.
And finally my favourite one: "The Garden of Earthly Delights" by Bosch!!!
This was the triplych in front of which I stood for 15 minutes inspecting every single details of the possible symbolism of. I was so happy that I was able to see the real painting. All the things were just impressive on there.
Sunday, March 6, 2011
Salvador Dali
Salvador Dali is a weird dude.
That's my first impression when I first saw him.
I call him Mustache Man sometimes XD
I mean look at him.
MUSTACHEEEEE!!!!!!!!
XD
Ok I'm done being crazy.
But it is true that he is a very strange person-which I assume all artists are to some extent, but his personality was just......peculiar at the time. I guess it's this type of personality that gave him this kind of revolutionary talent, and also vise versa. They can't live without each other because they made each other. Such a beautiful relationship.
Anyway, I like his paintings, maybe because he's a surrealist and I like surrealists. I usually like paranoia unless it hurts other people and then it turns bad. But Salavador Dali is not like that and I respect him for that. :)
I think his paintings are revolutionary and very imaginative.
My favourite piece is the Salvador Dali's version of the Cruxificion
It gives a 3 dimensional feelings to the painting with an unorthodox style. I like how Christ was being penetrated on the cross that is made of floating cubes. It gives a modern touch to a classical theme. And I like how Christ's expression was tilting away from the viewer so that it cannot be seen. Mary regards her son on the crucifix with an almost unconcerned expression. Very interesting. And it's also weird how Christ have this immaculate body without stains or blood.
And of course, the most famous Dali painting. Persistence of Memory.
I have no idea what this painting is about. But I like it. I have an idea how this painting is like a protrayal of inside people's brains. Like how all these times we've had in our memories are lying around in our brains and some fragments are just dying in it.
It's my guess anyway. I think a lot of people have already came up with that. :P
Well.
He's a weird dude. But with talent.
Peace.
That's my first impression when I first saw him.
I call him Mustache Man sometimes XD
I mean look at him.
MUSTACHEEEEE!!!!!!!!
XD
Ok I'm done being crazy.
But it is true that he is a very strange person-which I assume all artists are to some extent, but his personality was just......peculiar at the time. I guess it's this type of personality that gave him this kind of revolutionary talent, and also vise versa. They can't live without each other because they made each other. Such a beautiful relationship.
Anyway, I like his paintings, maybe because he's a surrealist and I like surrealists. I usually like paranoia unless it hurts other people and then it turns bad. But Salavador Dali is not like that and I respect him for that. :)
I think his paintings are revolutionary and very imaginative.
My favourite piece is the Salvador Dali's version of the Cruxificion
It gives a 3 dimensional feelings to the painting with an unorthodox style. I like how Christ was being penetrated on the cross that is made of floating cubes. It gives a modern touch to a classical theme. And I like how Christ's expression was tilting away from the viewer so that it cannot be seen. Mary regards her son on the crucifix with an almost unconcerned expression. Very interesting. And it's also weird how Christ have this immaculate body without stains or blood.
And of course, the most famous Dali painting. Persistence of Memory.
I have no idea what this painting is about. But I like it. I have an idea how this painting is like a protrayal of inside people's brains. Like how all these times we've had in our memories are lying around in our brains and some fragments are just dying in it.
It's my guess anyway. I think a lot of people have already came up with that. :P
Well.
He's a weird dude. But with talent.
Peace.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
About Mannerism
Blah, I am so hungry I can hear my stomach repeatedly rumbling......My mom is making lamb chops :P
Maybe I'll talk about culinary art next time hehe. Everybody loves food.
Ok here we go
It may be offensive to some people. Caution.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I find Mannerism interesting, but i'm not exactly very fond of it.
The chiaroscuro and the colour is very smooth and pretty, which i have to admit. But the drawing style...nmmm. Twisting human figures in a way of exaggeration is good, but I don't like the fact that it became the norm or convention of how people judge a piece of art. I mean how can people judge and get famous just because they do well in this particular type of art???
I saw many pieces of Mannerism art that they all kind of look the same in the enlongated body and the S curve. The figura serpentinata is getting old after seeing some of them, same with the contrapposto pose in ancient Greek art.
The Madonna with the Long Neck is one of them which I am not very fond of:
The baby Christ's serpent figura serpentinata is very unnatural. His arm is dangling off from his mother's legs, his entire body is twisted and enlongated that he does not look like a proper baby, either of magnificence or innocence. His body seems to be falling off any second from his mother's laps. And his mother is literally supporting her child with one arm that's not even half way down his back. I know how Mary's expression and body gesture is showing how proud she is, but isn't this proud going a little bit too far?? I mean, she is more willing to put her fingers on her chest to illustrate proud than to secure her child's safety??
Personally, I think this painting neglected the mother and child relationship to put emphasis on the religious perspective. That, to me, is not a good thing. I've always thought of Madonna and Child as something that's personal, that's intimate. Mary carefully cradle her baby in her arms with a motherly smile on her face, and not......this.
But on the other hand, I think the Rape of Sabine Women is an impressive piece.
It illustrated the fear and brutality very well. And in this case, the figura serpentinata is well-used. These conventions are supposed to enhance the painting and not be the centre of purpose. The twisted bodies of women are reasonable because they are either being beaten up or getting raped. And the elongated features looks more natural because of the chaos and fear within the women.
This is a nice touch.
Well, whether we like it or not, Mannerism has been here in history, and it had been the norm once, so we cannot change anything, can we?
Maybe I'll talk about culinary art next time hehe. Everybody loves food.
Ok here we go
It may be offensive to some people. Caution.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I find Mannerism interesting, but i'm not exactly very fond of it.
The chiaroscuro and the colour is very smooth and pretty, which i have to admit. But the drawing style...nmmm. Twisting human figures in a way of exaggeration is good, but I don't like the fact that it became the norm or convention of how people judge a piece of art. I mean how can people judge and get famous just because they do well in this particular type of art???
I saw many pieces of Mannerism art that they all kind of look the same in the enlongated body and the S curve. The figura serpentinata is getting old after seeing some of them, same with the contrapposto pose in ancient Greek art.
The Madonna with the Long Neck is one of them which I am not very fond of:
The baby Christ's serpent figura serpentinata is very unnatural. His arm is dangling off from his mother's legs, his entire body is twisted and enlongated that he does not look like a proper baby, either of magnificence or innocence. His body seems to be falling off any second from his mother's laps. And his mother is literally supporting her child with one arm that's not even half way down his back. I know how Mary's expression and body gesture is showing how proud she is, but isn't this proud going a little bit too far?? I mean, she is more willing to put her fingers on her chest to illustrate proud than to secure her child's safety??
Personally, I think this painting neglected the mother and child relationship to put emphasis on the religious perspective. That, to me, is not a good thing. I've always thought of Madonna and Child as something that's personal, that's intimate. Mary carefully cradle her baby in her arms with a motherly smile on her face, and not......this.
But on the other hand, I think the Rape of Sabine Women is an impressive piece.
It illustrated the fear and brutality very well. And in this case, the figura serpentinata is well-used. These conventions are supposed to enhance the painting and not be the centre of purpose. The twisted bodies of women are reasonable because they are either being beaten up or getting raped. And the elongated features looks more natural because of the chaos and fear within the women.
This is a nice touch.
Well, whether we like it or not, Mannerism has been here in history, and it had been the norm once, so we cannot change anything, can we?
Sunday, January 16, 2011
About Pompeii
I've always thought of Pompeii as a very advanced city inside the Roman Empire. Well..honestly I do not know about any other Italy cities during the Roman Empire. I would definitely like to learn more about their civilization.
What amazes me is that even after the enormous eruption of Mount Versuvius, so many remainings of the city is still here.
I read about some of it in both the Oxford Book and the Art History book...but sadly there wasn't enough information for me to know more about how they lived...
Personally I think the amphitheatre of Pompeii is the most impressive.
This is obviously a demostration showing the advanced system and magnificence of the Ancient Roman Empire. The structure is amazingly symmetrical and is obviously very stable since it survived the eruption. The Romans back then must be very much proud of their civilization. From this I can also see the innovation and creativity within the architects back then...I would've never thought of putting two theatres together to make a colosseum.
Furthermore, I can sense how much the Romans liked entertainment. That must be where the gladiators fought lions. Cruel...but exhilrating somehow. The watchers must had some enjoyment.
I have seen this picture in my Oxford book when it mentioned Pompeii:
The book said the couples was the "baker and his wife" but when I searched it up the data said their identity is disputable.....?
Again, very impressive style with some interest in casting some shadows to create three dimensional space, especially considering that this was a wall painting.
Although I am not very touched on the emotional side of this painting. I wish they could've had some more expression to make connection with the viewer..but maybe it is just my opinion because I like to seek sympathy with the piece of art. However, it is a good job for a contemporary piece in the Ancient Roman Time. The Greeks would've done it better....I think.....
Anyway, I think Pompeii is a very interesting subject for me to discuss about, despite my lack of knowledge about it. I may watch a movie about it someday, especially about the last day of it. (Sorry I like looking at the despair of the people and the atmosphere before the volcano is about to erupt...it is ART)
PS. Versuvius is a great name....I wonder why would people use this name on a volcano...
What amazes me is that even after the enormous eruption of Mount Versuvius, so many remainings of the city is still here.
I read about some of it in both the Oxford Book and the Art History book...but sadly there wasn't enough information for me to know more about how they lived...
Personally I think the amphitheatre of Pompeii is the most impressive.
This is obviously a demostration showing the advanced system and magnificence of the Ancient Roman Empire. The structure is amazingly symmetrical and is obviously very stable since it survived the eruption. The Romans back then must be very much proud of their civilization. From this I can also see the innovation and creativity within the architects back then...I would've never thought of putting two theatres together to make a colosseum.
Furthermore, I can sense how much the Romans liked entertainment. That must be where the gladiators fought lions. Cruel...but exhilrating somehow. The watchers must had some enjoyment.
I have seen this picture in my Oxford book when it mentioned Pompeii:
The book said the couples was the "baker and his wife" but when I searched it up the data said their identity is disputable.....?
Again, very impressive style with some interest in casting some shadows to create three dimensional space, especially considering that this was a wall painting.
Although I am not very touched on the emotional side of this painting. I wish they could've had some more expression to make connection with the viewer..but maybe it is just my opinion because I like to seek sympathy with the piece of art. However, it is a good job for a contemporary piece in the Ancient Roman Time. The Greeks would've done it better....I think.....
Anyway, I think Pompeii is a very interesting subject for me to discuss about, despite my lack of knowledge about it. I may watch a movie about it someday, especially about the last day of it. (Sorry I like looking at the despair of the people and the atmosphere before the volcano is about to erupt...it is ART)
PS. Versuvius is a great name....I wonder why would people use this name on a volcano...
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Neoclassical Art
You know what I have realized in my taste of art?
I like a lot of art having simple designs and down-to-earth styles. Unlike the ostentatious jewels and frivolous mood in the Rococo art, it is very modest. It's very hard to imagine the style of Rococo and Neoclassical can be so close in time. It is an extremely big shift in such a short time...or maybe it is because there was already anti-Rococo style during the period but it just never made an impression on people back then...
Well anyways I really like some of it. Although I am not so fond of the frequency of Napoleon being portrayed as a invincible leader. Well..he is invincible..maybe just not simple and plain enough.
My favourite is the Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi done by Angelica Kauffmann.
I like the beauty of modesty of Conelia. Her clothing are simple but has a graceful mother vibe to her. Especially when she gestures her "precious jewels" towards the woman that was showing off her jewelry. The distinct contrast reveals Cornelia's love as a mother very well.
But maybe I am a bit of hypocrite saying that I like Neoclassical art. Because I don't really enjoy the political drawings and sculptures of histoical figures. Like Houdon's George Washington and stuff like that.
I mean, they are okay but...historical figures are very cliche.
So maybe I am not a fan of Neoclassical painting.
Just genre paintings I guess then.
Okay.
I like a lot of art having simple designs and down-to-earth styles. Unlike the ostentatious jewels and frivolous mood in the Rococo art, it is very modest. It's very hard to imagine the style of Rococo and Neoclassical can be so close in time. It is an extremely big shift in such a short time...or maybe it is because there was already anti-Rococo style during the period but it just never made an impression on people back then...
Well anyways I really like some of it. Although I am not so fond of the frequency of Napoleon being portrayed as a invincible leader. Well..he is invincible..maybe just not simple and plain enough.
My favourite is the Cornelia, Mother of the Gracchi done by Angelica Kauffmann.
I like the beauty of modesty of Conelia. Her clothing are simple but has a graceful mother vibe to her. Especially when she gestures her "precious jewels" towards the woman that was showing off her jewelry. The distinct contrast reveals Cornelia's love as a mother very well.
But maybe I am a bit of hypocrite saying that I like Neoclassical art. Because I don't really enjoy the political drawings and sculptures of histoical figures. Like Houdon's George Washington and stuff like that.
I mean, they are okay but...historical figures are very cliche.
So maybe I am not a fan of Neoclassical painting.
Just genre paintings I guess then.
Okay.
Sunday, January 2, 2011
About Dutch Art
Happy New Year everyone! Hope you all had a good start of the year.
My start is pretty awesome overall :) Not exactly very special but I was happy and satisfied. I hope this will be a good year for me.
So this is the first update in 2011! Yay :D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was reading the Art History book and I saw a section on Dutch art.
At first I frowned, questioning:"What the heck is Dutch art? It doesn't sound very special."
Of course that was before I read the book and saw the art XD
I really like the style of Dutch Art during their Golden Age. I love its details and advanced techniques in portraiture as well as still life and flower painting.
I can understand the Dutch's love for genre painting, I guess, because Amsterdam and other Dutch areas give me the "down-to-earth" kind of feeling. I wonder why it never gave me an urban-like impression..I haven't even been to Amsterdam before and it's strange how the image just formed in my head :/
The first portrait that made an impression on me is the "Buffoon Playing a Lute" by Frans Hals. When i think of "portraits", I think of pictures with a person drawn in naturalistic style with that person's most distinct characteristics of the appearance. Just appearance. With no expression what-so-ever. And usually in my mind, a portrait contains only one's body above one's shoulder as well.
But look at this:
My first reaction seeing it is this: o_0
And then it completely altered my mind about portraits. This portrait shows movement and emotion that depicts the characteristic of the person-both appearance-wise and personality-wise. The convincingly joyful smile is also a very rare case during that period of time. This also made an impression on me because it gives me an warm feeling seeing the person enjoying life so much.
I also like the still lifes of Dutch art, especially their vanitas paintings. I like their idea of wanting to show the fleeting life because this way it emphasizes the "moment" more. (Why is this starting to sound more and more like Impressionism..? Hmmm)
An example.
Flower paintings of Rachel Ruysch impressed me as well. I like her detail of each petal as well as the colours.
Pweety~~
But unfortunately to be frank, the Genre paintings of Dutch Art is not as impressive in my mind. It's like any other genre paintings to me. I can't see anything special except maybe their light source.
Well that's about it ~
My start is pretty awesome overall :) Not exactly very special but I was happy and satisfied. I hope this will be a good year for me.
So this is the first update in 2011! Yay :D
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was reading the Art History book and I saw a section on Dutch art.
At first I frowned, questioning:"What the heck is Dutch art? It doesn't sound very special."
Of course that was before I read the book and saw the art XD
I really like the style of Dutch Art during their Golden Age. I love its details and advanced techniques in portraiture as well as still life and flower painting.
I can understand the Dutch's love for genre painting, I guess, because Amsterdam and other Dutch areas give me the "down-to-earth" kind of feeling. I wonder why it never gave me an urban-like impression..I haven't even been to Amsterdam before and it's strange how the image just formed in my head :/
The first portrait that made an impression on me is the "Buffoon Playing a Lute" by Frans Hals. When i think of "portraits", I think of pictures with a person drawn in naturalistic style with that person's most distinct characteristics of the appearance. Just appearance. With no expression what-so-ever. And usually in my mind, a portrait contains only one's body above one's shoulder as well.
But look at this:
My first reaction seeing it is this: o_0
And then it completely altered my mind about portraits. This portrait shows movement and emotion that depicts the characteristic of the person-both appearance-wise and personality-wise. The convincingly joyful smile is also a very rare case during that period of time. This also made an impression on me because it gives me an warm feeling seeing the person enjoying life so much.
I also like the still lifes of Dutch art, especially their vanitas paintings. I like their idea of wanting to show the fleeting life because this way it emphasizes the "moment" more. (Why is this starting to sound more and more like Impressionism..? Hmmm)
An example.
Flower paintings of Rachel Ruysch impressed me as well. I like her detail of each petal as well as the colours.
Pweety~~
But unfortunately to be frank, the Genre paintings of Dutch Art is not as impressive in my mind. It's like any other genre paintings to me. I can't see anything special except maybe their light source.
Well that's about it ~
Saturday, December 11, 2010
About Lapis Lazuli
Ever since I started reading the Oxford Book I have been seeing a lot of famous art-works with the name "Lapis Lazuli" in it. I became curious about it so I did some research and figured I should write something about this incredibly beautiful gem.
Isn't that pretty?
According to my (really crappy) research. Lapis Lazuli are found in the northeastern Aghanistan and were popular because of it's intensity of blue. In latin "lapis" means stone and "lazuli" basically has an indication of the colour blue.
I think we call that royal blue in Canada, not so much lapis lazuli because it is difficult to pronounce.
I am reading the Renaissance part of the Oxford book right now and many of the paintings as well as mosaics of Madonna and Child has the Virgin's robe in lapis lazuli. It might be a symbol of royalty and innocence?
In Egypt lapis lazuli seemed to be a popular gem to make amulets for royalties as well as ornaments like pendants and other accessories. It seems to be used in the early east civilizations as well like Mesopotamia. Lapis Lazuli was used in the Assyrians and Babylonians for seals and it was also used as eyeshadow when it was powdered by Cleopatra.
It's amazing how the deep blue were used so frequently for royalty. I wonder if it was exclusively for royalty though, like in China only the emperor could wear the colour yellow and gold.
From the picture I can almost sense the holiness of this type of gem. It's like it has some luminosity within it, like a sort of spirit.
How can nature just make something like this? It's a wonder.
Isn't that pretty?
According to my (really crappy) research. Lapis Lazuli are found in the northeastern Aghanistan and were popular because of it's intensity of blue. In latin "lapis" means stone and "lazuli" basically has an indication of the colour blue.
I think we call that royal blue in Canada, not so much lapis lazuli because it is difficult to pronounce.
I am reading the Renaissance part of the Oxford book right now and many of the paintings as well as mosaics of Madonna and Child has the Virgin's robe in lapis lazuli. It might be a symbol of royalty and innocence?
In Egypt lapis lazuli seemed to be a popular gem to make amulets for royalties as well as ornaments like pendants and other accessories. It seems to be used in the early east civilizations as well like Mesopotamia. Lapis Lazuli was used in the Assyrians and Babylonians for seals and it was also used as eyeshadow when it was powdered by Cleopatra.
It's amazing how the deep blue were used so frequently for royalty. I wonder if it was exclusively for royalty though, like in China only the emperor could wear the colour yellow and gold.
From the picture I can almost sense the holiness of this type of gem. It's like it has some luminosity within it, like a sort of spirit.
How can nature just make something like this? It's a wonder.
Sunday, December 5, 2010
The Alexander Sarcophagus
I've been wondering about the legends of Alexander the Great for quite some time now. I was wondering about his existance. He was definitely a real person, but the fact that a perfect so perfect actually existed in this world just seemed surreal to me.
See, he was handsome.
He was intelligent.
He was a great leader, encouraging the kings from other countries he conquered to help govern the states and respected their own culture.
He had great military power, able to conquer Persia and all those other countries.
And finally, he died being perfect.
I would most likely say "How bogus is that?!?!?" if I just heard this legend right now.
But the point is, that he existed in this world and left the world many artistic legacies, with the most significant one being the Alexander Sarcophagus.
Just look at the intricate high relief on the sides, showing the most amazing scenes of battle at that time. It also has a blend of different cultures of the regions that he conquered, which makes it all the more fascinating and makes him all the more admirable. I saw the Oxford book talking about the sarcophagus and I wished it had more information on the sarcaphagus.
The sarcophagus must be crafted from different crafters from the regions that he conquered. And the notion that all of the crafters working under one piece of magnificent art piece makes me want to bow at Alexander the Great's charisma for assuming his people's loyalty towards him, even the ones that he conquered over. That was just amazing for me to see since in History class all I learned was about dictators......It is highly unlikely for a person to have so much power and capability without abusing it. (I know I would.)
The sarcophagus further stunned me with the contrast on the front and the back. One side is all chaotic and shows the wildness and the ugliness of the battle, whereas the back shows all of the people fighting as a team with impressive cooperation. I am not much informed on the sarcophagus, so forgive me if I am wrong, but i think that the sarcophagus is trying to emphasize the power of Alexander of organizing his army. With Alexander shown in the piece with a lion helmet, it not only protrays the his power, but also his personality and his ambition.
I wonder if I meet him would I get entranced by his charm too....:/
See, he was handsome.
He was intelligent.
He was a great leader, encouraging the kings from other countries he conquered to help govern the states and respected their own culture.
He had great military power, able to conquer Persia and all those other countries.
And finally, he died being perfect.
I would most likely say "How bogus is that?!?!?" if I just heard this legend right now.
But the point is, that he existed in this world and left the world many artistic legacies, with the most significant one being the Alexander Sarcophagus.
Just look at the intricate high relief on the sides, showing the most amazing scenes of battle at that time. It also has a blend of different cultures of the regions that he conquered, which makes it all the more fascinating and makes him all the more admirable. I saw the Oxford book talking about the sarcophagus and I wished it had more information on the sarcaphagus.
The sarcophagus must be crafted from different crafters from the regions that he conquered. And the notion that all of the crafters working under one piece of magnificent art piece makes me want to bow at Alexander the Great's charisma for assuming his people's loyalty towards him, even the ones that he conquered over. That was just amazing for me to see since in History class all I learned was about dictators......It is highly unlikely for a person to have so much power and capability without abusing it. (I know I would.)
The sarcophagus further stunned me with the contrast on the front and the back. One side is all chaotic and shows the wildness and the ugliness of the battle, whereas the back shows all of the people fighting as a team with impressive cooperation. I am not much informed on the sarcophagus, so forgive me if I am wrong, but i think that the sarcophagus is trying to emphasize the power of Alexander of organizing his army. With Alexander shown in the piece with a lion helmet, it not only protrays the his power, but also his personality and his ambition.
I wonder if I meet him would I get entranced by his charm too....:/
Sunday, November 28, 2010
About the Japanese
I've been admiring Japan for a long time, even before I was too young and ignorant to be culturally appreciative. I was merely fascinated by the manga, the games, and the anime....which I still am. But before I've always dreamed of the high-tech-ness of Tokyo and the people and the shingansen and just the amazing technology.
So then I went to Japan two times. One time to Tokyo and I was stunned by the clean, civilized and incredibly crowded streets where all I could see was people's heads. The technology was scarily advanced, and I kept staring people's cellphones like a idiot.
Hm, you'd think Mocha would be less bitter.
The second time I went to Japan is to Nagoya in an exchange program. I thought of it as another way to buy manga and see high-tech stuff.
BIG MISTAKE.
I did see high technology, but then I realized something else.
Since Nagoya and Kyoto are old...I got to see the amazing architecture built by the ancient Japanese and it completely altered my point of view of Japan to a whole new perspective.
And then of course that was where the weepy-ness kicked into me.
The matter-of-fact idea of Japan having had a gloriously glittering culture hit me late, but eventually I got to learn more about their civilization in the Oxford book and in my civilization textbook. The civilization textbook talked more about the culture and what happened, and the Oxford book elaborated more on the aesthetic perspective. I wouldn't be able to link the things together if i didn't have my civilization book.....thank you civilization.
So the main topic.
It's amazing how beautiful Japan looks, huh?
Many people found the Heian period unnatural and kind of weird. But it is true that it made a huge contribution to the current Japanese culture. The Tale of Genji wouldn' be here if it wasn't for this period. The Tale of Genji made the historians know more about the way of living as well as the perspective on art.
For example:
This picture explicitly shows what the Heian people expect in a home. No separation on the inside and outside, the extremely well-organized garden with water and plants, and layers and the colors of women's clothing.
I also admired the aesthetics of the shogunate periods. It's very amazing how their views changed so dramatically in such a short period. I wonder if it was the bafuku's influence?
This is the Jochiji temple which was one of the Zen Buddhism schools.
Cool beauty huh?
In this kind of enviroment, no wonder the samurais are appreciative and willing to work.
Practising in that kind of scenery is going to get the energy out no matter what.
Sunday, November 14, 2010
About Buddhism
I was reading the entire chapter on Buddhism on the Oxford book the other day.
I knew that Buddhism originated from India, but it still very fascinating to think although it began in India, it is the main religion in China and Japan and Korea. Ironically, the main religion in India is not Buddhism but Hinduism.
My family's basically Buddhists. I'm from Chinese heritage after all. I remember that I used go to Chinese temples with my family every year and burned incense until my eyes water by the strong smell. I was a little kid back then, so I didn't really get the point of kneeling down in front of a giant, scary-looking sculpture and bow for it. I mainly did it because I thought it was fun and sometimes I would mumble out random wishes like "I wish I can have candy for dinner" or something like that. For me, going to the Buddhist temples is like a festival.
My grandmother on my mother's side is Buddhist. She is fully dedicated to the religion and she is a vegetarian. She used to tell me all kinds of stories that reveals to me explicitly about her faith towards Buddha. She told me about the reincarnations, the Noble Eighth Fold Path, and Nirvana. I loved to listen to her and listen to the repeated chanting in her recorder. I loved to watch her sitting in the same place on her bed for two hours everyday, legs crossed, either meditating or praying. I liked seeing her fingers moving through the beads one by one.
She still does it right now. But I've grown to know that I'm not supposed to interrupt her meditation time anymore. But sometimes I still go into her room and watch her quietly.
So, I kinda digress.
Anyways, I think the true Buddhism is still in India. See, the Buddhism in China as well as in Japan have a twist to match their own culture. The actual Buddhism is the one with Sanskrit and no Bodhisattva. Bodhisattavas are something that the Chinese people added later on to blend with their own myths. So in the Chinese culture, there is mortals, immortals, king of the immortals, Guanyin and the Bodhisattvas, and finally Buddha. It's like a pyramid. For example, the Chinese legendary Yi who shot off 9 of the suns belongs to the immortals, who look up to Buddha and his enlightenment. If the immortals meditate, they will eventually become one of the Bodhisattavas, and if they don't behave well, they sometimes get back into the life cycle and become human again. The religion itself is perfected in the way of the Chinese, but Buddhists in India and Japan are somewhat different too, I believe.
And I am also quite intrigued by the way Buddhist perfected the ancient Chinese culture. It's because of the Buddhist religion that China was able to write one of the four most famous novels in Chinese history.
I don't know much about the Japanese (except for Zen) or Korean Buddhism......and the book is talking about the architecture so....
I'll talk about the Japanese things next time :D
I knew that Buddhism originated from India, but it still very fascinating to think although it began in India, it is the main religion in China and Japan and Korea. Ironically, the main religion in India is not Buddhism but Hinduism.
My family's basically Buddhists. I'm from Chinese heritage after all. I remember that I used go to Chinese temples with my family every year and burned incense until my eyes water by the strong smell. I was a little kid back then, so I didn't really get the point of kneeling down in front of a giant, scary-looking sculpture and bow for it. I mainly did it because I thought it was fun and sometimes I would mumble out random wishes like "I wish I can have candy for dinner" or something like that. For me, going to the Buddhist temples is like a festival.
My grandmother on my mother's side is Buddhist. She is fully dedicated to the religion and she is a vegetarian. She used to tell me all kinds of stories that reveals to me explicitly about her faith towards Buddha. She told me about the reincarnations, the Noble Eighth Fold Path, and Nirvana. I loved to listen to her and listen to the repeated chanting in her recorder. I loved to watch her sitting in the same place on her bed for two hours everyday, legs crossed, either meditating or praying. I liked seeing her fingers moving through the beads one by one.
She still does it right now. But I've grown to know that I'm not supposed to interrupt her meditation time anymore. But sometimes I still go into her room and watch her quietly.
So, I kinda digress.
Anyways, I think the true Buddhism is still in India. See, the Buddhism in China as well as in Japan have a twist to match their own culture. The actual Buddhism is the one with Sanskrit and no Bodhisattva. Bodhisattavas are something that the Chinese people added later on to blend with their own myths. So in the Chinese culture, there is mortals, immortals, king of the immortals, Guanyin and the Bodhisattvas, and finally Buddha. It's like a pyramid. For example, the Chinese legendary Yi who shot off 9 of the suns belongs to the immortals, who look up to Buddha and his enlightenment. If the immortals meditate, they will eventually become one of the Bodhisattavas, and if they don't behave well, they sometimes get back into the life cycle and become human again. The religion itself is perfected in the way of the Chinese, but Buddhists in India and Japan are somewhat different too, I believe.
And I am also quite intrigued by the way Buddhist perfected the ancient Chinese culture. It's because of the Buddhist religion that China was able to write one of the four most famous novels in Chinese history.
I don't know much about the Japanese (except for Zen) or Korean Buddhism......and the book is talking about the architecture so....
I'll talk about the Japanese things next time :D
Sunday, November 7, 2010
Classical Music
Is classical music going out of style??
Of course not. At least not in my world.
Well, the teenagers my age don't seem to enjoy classical music that much. They tend to play it if they listen to instruments, but normally I don't think they would listen to it.
But I like classical music D: . I've listened to a lot of composers and they are all good!
And......If I may brag......I am pretty interested in the backgrounds of the music.
Don't get me wrong. I like modern music too, but I just wanna talk about classical music first.
Generally, there is no real specific style that I like.
Okay. I might start by talking about the songs of specific composers.
WARNING. THIS IS VERY LIKELY TO BE SUPER LONG.
So please bear with me?
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Of course not. At least not in my world.
Well, the teenagers my age don't seem to enjoy classical music that much. They tend to play it if they listen to instruments, but normally I don't think they would listen to it.
But I like classical music D: . I've listened to a lot of composers and they are all good!
And......If I may brag......I am pretty interested in the backgrounds of the music.
Don't get me wrong. I like modern music too, but I just wanna talk about classical music first.
Generally, there is no real specific style that I like.
Okay. I might start by talking about the songs of specific composers.
WARNING. THIS IS VERY LIKELY TO BE SUPER LONG.
So please bear with me?
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart
Do I like Mozart?
Honestly? No. I have to admit, he is a musical genius. I respect him and his talent of being able to compose music at the age of 5. The music blood runs in the family. His passion towards music is truly impressive, considering that he composed over 600 melodies in total. And I like how he likes travelling. He is very fortunate that he was able to reach his full potential in music because his family is generally wealthy enough to sustain a living. His family also provided tons of inspiration through travelling through Europe. Without the contribution of his family, he wouldn't have achieved such a massive success.
I have a close friend who basically WORSHIPS Mozart. And she hates me for saying that I don't like Mozart. The truth is, his songs are not my type. I know it is elaborate the stuff, his symphony are very very intricate...but I just cannot seem to find myself to absolutely love it.
His style of music is too happy for me. It's always extremely joyous with a lot of embellishment.
Some examples:
Marriage of Figaro.
Piano Sonata.
Magic Flute.
Violin Concertos.
Eine Kleine Nachutmusik K.525
Divertimento K.136
Everytime I listen to those songs. I can imagine a girl on plain running and laughing. His music is a little bit too classical for me, I guess.
His style is similar with Haydn. Very happy. But Haydn's music is less 'ornated'.
But there is one exception. I like Mozart's Requiem. That kind of opera sounds very magnificent and dramatic. It is not his usual style (at least what I know), so I very much enjoyed it.
Joseph Maurice Ravel
One of my favourite composers.
His style is absolutely beautiful. I fell in love with his music that even my mom can hum out the songs because I play them too much with my flute.
I seem to favour impressionists more than classics because I like Debussy and Saint-Saëns a lot as well.
He seem to have attachment to Spain, because he was born near Spain, and that attachment inspired many of his melodies.Rapsodie espagnole being only one example.
He like pizzicato a lot :D. Usually not many violin songs include so many pizzicatos.
One of his famous songs :Pavane pour une infante défunte is my favourite song that is composed by him. He is brilliant for creating this. The protrait of Margarita Teresa really relates to this song. This song is not for grieve. It tells a story of how there used to be a young little girl who danced in the castles. It's beautiful styles links perfectly to the sadness in the song.
Other than that, I really love his String Quartet too. Its magnificent usage of pizzicato of the two violins, viola and cello creats a unique harmony to the ear.
Concerto pour la main gauche as well as Concerto pour piano et orchestre, sol majeur, are not the usual style of his work. It makes a somehow evil and devil-ish atmosphere. Playing it requires high technique, like it almost has an effect of a demon's lure or Pandora's Box.
Some of the other songs I like are:
Ma mere l'Oye- absolute masterpiece~all the movements have the theme of a fairy-tale~~
Gaspard de la Nuit
Charles Camille Saint-Saëns
DANSE MACABRE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am kind of crazy about Danse Macabre. I gives me a mixed feeling of danger and excitement of this omnious feeling at night. I am so enchanted. You know it is dangerous but you are too charmed to resist this sweet temptation. You cannot help but to dance with the devil, and it is almost like you want to indulge in this pleasure and sell your soul to the devil.
Oh my god I love it I love it I love it so much >_
And Saint Saens is a music genius too, starting to play piano at 2 years old!!! And performed with Bach, Mozart and Beethoven at 10!!!
His other music are not as brilliant as this one. So it doesn't leave me much impression of his other songs....i was too amazed at Danse Macabre.
I'll add more to it next time. So much more I want to talk about.
Sunday, October 24, 2010
About the Greek
WOW.....I'm updating my blog at the very constant rate now...haha :D
Every single Sunday..I didn't realize that until today XDD
This is great, I really hope I can keep up because I tend to get extremely lazy after a while.
Hmm I wanna do a post about classical music sometime...I hope I can get to do that next week.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GREEK PEOPLE WERE AWESOME.
That's what I've been thinking for a long time.
When I was little, I used to love reading all the stories and the Greek gods and things like that. Doesn't horoscopes come from the Greek myths too?
Seriously, Greek myth is the most interesting and most intricate and most fascinating myths at the time. I love how the Greeks made the gods resemble humans. I think it can tie the people very closely to their own religion because they can relate to the stories so well.
And it's amazing that the Greeks still have so many influence on the modern society, next to the ancient Romans.
See, many handsome people are usually described as "Greek God" and things like that.
And also the beauty of nudity. (But since I am still a teenager....yeah nudity kind of makes me feel awkward..)
And finally, the horoscopes, like I have said before.
Okay, now for the arts.
I was able to see many great masterpieces in the book I bought :)
I very much admire the way their sculptures were made. Instead of the linear version of just one side, it is basically natural in very angle. And their clothes pattern....just wow. It doesn't have any repetition or anything, it just looks so natural and so close to our modern art. It's like the clothes just smoothly flows and you can just touch the soft fabric in your hand.
My favourite, is of course. "The Charioteer".
Apparently it was placed in Delphi, which was believe to be the center and the most sacred place on Earth. It's significance is very obvious. But it is such a shame that we do not get the see the original version of Apollo standing on the chariot with the four horses....It must look stunning. It also used to have silver embellishment on Apollo's body to make him look more gracious but it was lost also...
It's elegance can also tell one the importance of the Phthian Games. I love the appreciation the Greek people had to competition. I wonder if the Roman's Lion Fighting stuff was adopted from the Greeks....
Sunday, October 17, 2010
About Minoan Crete
I was reading about the third millennium BC in the book I bought :D
So it is basically about the Egypitian art and the Mesopotamian art, which is completely normal since they were the two largest and earliest civilization in the world.
But then I came upon the Crete and their island culture. I have barely heard of this little culture and it somehow fascinated me thinking that there are milions of other little cultures in this world. I wish we can know more though. We know too little as humans.
Okay, back to topic.
I like how the the art in Minoan Crete emphasizes the simplicity as well as joy in their art, which is very rare, considering all the expressionless luxurious Egyptian paintings. I especially enjoy their appreciation towards nature around them, rather than worshipping the gods and finding their own identity.
So it is basically about the Egypitian art and the Mesopotamian art, which is completely normal since they were the two largest and earliest civilization in the world.
But then I came upon the Crete and their island culture. I have barely heard of this little culture and it somehow fascinated me thinking that there are milions of other little cultures in this world. I wish we can know more though. We know too little as humans.
Okay, back to topic.
I like how the the art in Minoan Crete emphasizes the simplicity as well as joy in their art, which is very rare, considering all the expressionless luxurious Egyptian paintings. I especially enjoy their appreciation towards nature around them, rather than worshipping the gods and finding their own identity.
My favourite is "The Springtime Fresco". The delicate outlines of the picture and the various colours explicitly expresses the worship the Minoan had towards nature. It is one of the earliest landscape drawings anywhere in the world. That just indicates how special the Minoan culture is.
This is my second favourite.
This vase has such a unique style that it amazes me. The people are not carved in profile, there are not any luxuries in the background, and it is not about anybody royal. My eyes were focused on their chanting and their laughter. I could almost hear their joy in harvesting. I could imagine their hyper and songs they sang as they got home carrying all their crops.
I am very surprised at this style, because most Egyptian doesn't have smiles on their faces and they focus on the afterlife and the activities. The Minoans definitely focus on their emotions more, which they should.
It's great.
Sunday, October 10, 2010
About the Stonehenge in London
So I was reading this book my mom bought me about Art History.
It's called A World History of Art.(How very original..)Apparently it was recommended
It's very interesting, although deadly heavy.
I came upon the pages where it was talking about the Neolithic artifacts.
It was about the Stonehenge. I was fascinated by the magnificence of it. The atmosphere is so enigmatic, making you wonder over and over again what the purpose this is and how in the world did underdeveloped minds can possibily build something like that.
It is said in the book that it was aligned according on the locations of the horizons, and the movement of the sun and moon. Apparently the stones are placed on the exact spot of the sunrise and moonrise and where the sun and the moon are during a time interval. The intricate lining of the stones are amazing. The bluestones placed inside of the ring was definitely for a spiritual purpose but it is a wonder how the Neolithic people brought these stones between 6 and 8 feet to their exact planned location. I was also wondering how would they place such big stones vertically without any developed tool back then?
Personally, I just think this is an architecture that was built both intellectually and religiously. The authors of the book said that it was used to predict a 300-year cycled elipses. I think it would be very difficult because humans do not live for 300years to see a cycle. And the people back then would not know that there is an elipse every 300 years without proper way to transfer knowledge. I believe that there is a way of recording down the knowledge of the elipses somewhere within the artifacts. Maybe behind their aesthetic disguise, there is a sort of message about these things.
And second, about the purpose of creating this thing.
I believe that the older the people were from the times, the closer they are related to nature and the existence of gods. Although I am agnostic-meaning that I believe the existence of god is questionable-,I cannot help but to wonder about the origins of the "worshipping the gods" concept. Maybe somewhere during the evolution process of eventually becoming Homo Sapien Sapien, people are becoming closer to gods. Maybe the knowledge and the beginning of arts is a quality given by the gods, and that is where all this begun. But as times goes by , people are beginning to be distracted from the beauty that they forgot the true purpose.
But then again that is just my assumption. :)
Again just think about what they were thinking about when they were building this makes me feel so many things.
It's called A World History of Art.(How very original..)Apparently it was recommended
It's very interesting, although deadly heavy.
I came upon the pages where it was talking about the Neolithic artifacts.
It was about the Stonehenge. I was fascinated by the magnificence of it. The atmosphere is so enigmatic, making you wonder over and over again what the purpose this is and how in the world did underdeveloped minds can possibily build something like that.
It is said in the book that it was aligned according on the locations of the horizons, and the movement of the sun and moon. Apparently the stones are placed on the exact spot of the sunrise and moonrise and where the sun and the moon are during a time interval. The intricate lining of the stones are amazing. The bluestones placed inside of the ring was definitely for a spiritual purpose but it is a wonder how the Neolithic people brought these stones between 6 and 8 feet to their exact planned location. I was also wondering how would they place such big stones vertically without any developed tool back then?
Personally, I just think this is an architecture that was built both intellectually and religiously. The authors of the book said that it was used to predict a 300-year cycled elipses. I think it would be very difficult because humans do not live for 300years to see a cycle. And the people back then would not know that there is an elipse every 300 years without proper way to transfer knowledge. I believe that there is a way of recording down the knowledge of the elipses somewhere within the artifacts. Maybe behind their aesthetic disguise, there is a sort of message about these things.
And second, about the purpose of creating this thing.
I believe that the older the people were from the times, the closer they are related to nature and the existence of gods. Although I am agnostic-meaning that I believe the existence of god is questionable-,I cannot help but to wonder about the origins of the "worshipping the gods" concept. Maybe somewhere during the evolution process of eventually becoming Homo Sapien Sapien, people are becoming closer to gods. Maybe the knowledge and the beginning of arts is a quality given by the gods, and that is where all this begun. But as times goes by , people are beginning to be distracted from the beauty that they forgot the true purpose.
But then again that is just my assumption. :)
Again just think about what they were thinking about when they were building this makes me feel so many things.
Friday, October 8, 2010
The reason for creating this blog
I can write anything for my other blog, why would I create this blog then?
The answer is simple.
I want there to be a corner where I can fully express my love for all the arts.
As many can see, my other blog is mainly focused on my life, my translations, my fanficitons, my originals, and game plus anime reviews. I've always watched to write something about the art works, the music, and the poems that I like, but there's never a chance because there is so many things that I want to write about with these magnificent culture and the products they produce.
So I created this blog,solely for everything there is to feel about arts.
The answer is simple.
I want there to be a corner where I can fully express my love for all the arts.
As many can see, my other blog is mainly focused on my life, my translations, my fanficitons, my originals, and game plus anime reviews. I've always watched to write something about the art works, the music, and the poems that I like, but there's never a chance because there is so many things that I want to write about with these magnificent culture and the products they produce.
So I created this blog,solely for everything there is to feel about arts.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)